 |
| Cadillac V8 (Flickr/Hugo 90) |
About five years ago, I was standing next to my grandfather watching a commercial for the
then-new Cadillac CTS and the announcer was touting its direct injected V6 with 300-something horsepower. My grandfather, long past his driving years but still filled with memories of his
'76 Coupe de Ville, turned to me and asked, "Does having a V6 cheapen a Cadillac?"
Grandpa raised a good point. I, raised on turbo fours and
preferring condensed European power to the brute force that's long been an American philosophy, thought it was a non-issue at the time. To him, a Cadillac wasn't a Cadillac without eight cylinders. (I wasn't born yet to ask him what he thought of the
Cimarron). He never really forgave GM for their downsizing in the '70s and '80s, either. If Grandpa were around today, I wonder what he'd say about the new
Cadillac ATS, the
3-series opponent that features two four-cylinders in its engine roster. He'd probably hate it. And, after much thought, I kind of have to agree with him.